enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of fact-checking websites - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fact-checking_websites

    Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable. Please help improve this article by looking for better, more reliable sources. Unreliable citations may be challenged and removed.

  3. Blacklane - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blacklane

    Blacklane GmbH is a provider of premium global chauffeur services, which provides a chauffeur portal connecting people to professional chauffeurs via their mobile app, website and hotline. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] The company offers a prebooking service at a fixed rate and doesn't own its own fleet, but works with local chauffeur companies [ 3 ] in each of ...

  4. Wikipedia:What is a reliable source? - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_is_a...

    A reliable source is one that presents a well-reasoned theory or argument supported by strong evidence. Reliable sources include scholarly, peer-reviewed articles or books written by researchers for students and researchers, which can be found in academic databases and search engines like JSTOR and Google Scholar .

  5. How Blacklane is taking on Uber and Lyft amid COVID-19 - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/blacklane-taking-uber-lyft-amid...

    Jens Wohltorf, Blacklane CEO & Co-Founder joins the Yahoo Finance Live panel to discuss how Blacklane seeks to challenge Uber and Lyft in city rides. How Blacklane is taking on Uber and Lyft amid ...

  6. List of academic databases and search engines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_academic_databases...

    The main academic full-text databases are open archives or link-resolution services, although others operate under different models such as mirroring or hybrid publishers. . Such services typically provide access to full text and full-text search, but also metadata about items for which no full text is availa

  7. Wikipedia : Potentially unreliable sources

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Potentially...

    Examples of such promotional journals include Creation Research Society Quarterly, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, and Homeopathy. Be aware of predatory publishers, for example journals published by OMICS Publishing Group. These are very unlikely to be accepted as reliable sources.

  8. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RSN

    I still think it should be considered generally reliable, but with an RS:P notice addressing both the concepts of fact checking ("Since it often covers fringe material, parity of sources may be relevant." from WP:SNOPES, "Check Your Fact is often a tertiary source. Editors prefer reliable secondary sources over Check Your Fact when available."

  9. Fact-checking - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact-checking

    Research has shown that fact-checking has limits, and can even backfire, [89] which is when a correction increases the their belief in the misconception. [90] One reason is that it can be interpreted as an argument from authority , leading to resistance and hardening beliefs, "because identity and cultural positions cannot be disproved."