enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Hunter v. Erickson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_v._Erickson

    Hunter v. Erickson, 393 U.S. 385 (1969), was a United States Supreme Court case.. The question in the case was "whether the City of Akron, Ohio, has denied [a black citizen] the equal protection of its laws by amending the city charter to prevent the city council from implementing any ordinance dealing with racial, religious, or ancestral discrimination in housing without the approval of the ...

  3. Powers v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powers_v._Ohio

    Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case that re-examined the Batson Challenge. [1] Established by Batson v.Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), the Batson Challenge [2] prohibits jury selectors from using peremptory challenges on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, and sex.

  4. Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. Dayton Christian Schools, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_Civil_Rights...

    Seal of the Ohio Civil Rights Commission. Linda Hoskinson was hired as an elementary school teacher at Dayton Christian Schools during the 1978-1979 school year. Her employment contract required following a "biblical chain of command" [3] [4] in lieu of using the state legal system and a signed statement of faith. [5]

  5. Moore v. City of East Cleveland - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore_v._City_of_East...

    Moore v. City of East Cleveland, 431 U.S. 494 (1977), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that an East Cleveland, Ohio zoning ordinance that prohibited Inez Moore, a black grandmother, from living with her grandchild was unconstitutional.

  6. Zelman v. Simmons-Harris - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zelman_v._Simmons-Harris

    Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, 536 U.S. 639 (2002), was a 5–4 decision of the United States Supreme Court that upheld an Ohio program that used school vouchers.The Court decided that the program did not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, as long as parents using the program were allowed to choose among a range of secular and religious schools.

  7. Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Board_of...

    The Supreme Court ruled that the mandatory maternity leave rules were unconstitutional under the Due Process Clauses in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Essentially, the rules were found to be too arbitrary (fixed dates chosen for no apparent reason) and irrebuttable (having no relation to individual medical conditions and with no way to ...

  8. The U.S. Supreme Court has created a First Amendment ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/u-supreme-court-created-first...

    For decades, the Supreme Court held that stopping discrimination is more important than the freedom to discriminate. The U.S. Supreme Court has created a First Amendment right to discrimination ...

  9. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jones_v._Alfred_H._Mayer_Co.

    Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409 (1968), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case which held that Congress could regulate the sale of private property to prevent racial discrimination: "[42 U.S.C. § 1982] bars all racial discrimination, private as well as public, in the sale or rental of property, and that the statute, thus construed, is a valid exercise of the power of ...

  1. Related searches which amendment made discrimination illegal in ohio supreme court cle compliance

    powers v ohio lawsuitpowers v ohio