Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969), was a 1969 United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that police officers arresting a person at his home could not search the entire home without a search warrant, but that police may search the area within immediate reach of the person without a warrant. [1]
Search incident to a lawful arrest, commonly known as search incident to arrest (SITA) or the Chimel rule (from Chimel v.California), is a U.S. legal principle that allows police to perform a warrantless search of an arrested person, and the area within the arrestee’s immediate control, in the interest of officer safety, the prevention of escape, and the preservation of evidence.
395 U.S. 621 (1969) right to vote in a special election district Lear, Inc. v. Adkins: 395 U.S. 653 (1969) overturning the doctrine of licensee estoppel in U.S. patent law: Chimel v. California: 395 U.S. 752 (1969) search and seizure incident to arrest: Benton v. Maryland: 395 U.S. 784 (1969) double jeopardy
New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when a police officer has made a lawful custodial arrest of the occupant of an automobile, the officer may, as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest, search the passenger compartment of that automobile.
Download as PDF; Printable version; ... Pages in category "1969 in California" ... Chimel v. California; G. 11th Annual Grammy Awards; H.
Created Date: 8/30/2012 4:52:52 PM
united states district court for the district of columbia _____ public employees for environmental ) responsibility, et al., )
The first case of bird flu in a human in Ohio has been reported, according to officials.. A farm worker from Mercer County, Ohio, located on the state's western border along Indiana, came into ...