Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969), was a 1969 United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that police officers arresting a person at his home could not search the entire home without a search warrant, but that police may search the area within immediate reach of the person without a warrant. [1]
Search incident to a lawful arrest, commonly known as search incident to arrest (SITA) or the Chimel rule (from Chimel v.California), is a U.S. legal principle that allows police to perform a warrantless search of an arrested person, and the area within the arrestee’s immediate control, in the interest of officer safety, the prevention of escape, and the preservation of evidence.
395 U.S. 486 (1969) political question doctrine, justiciability: Kramer v. Union School District: 395 U.S. 621 (1969) right to vote in a special election district Lear, Inc. v. Adkins: 395 U.S. 653 (1969) overturning the doctrine of licensee estoppel in U.S. patent law: Chimel v. California: 395 U.S. 752 (1969) search and seizure incident to ...
Case name Citation Date decided United States v. King: 395 U.S. 1: 1969: Leary v. United States: 395 U.S. 6: 1969: United States v. Covington: 395 U.S. 57: 1969
Download as PDF; Printable version; ... Pages in category "1969 in California" ... Chimel v. California; G. 11th Annual Grammy Awards; H.
Download as PDF; Printable version; ... Pages in category "1969 in United States case law" ... Chimel v. California; Coffey v. State Educational Finance Commission
Hill v. California, 401 U.S. 797 (1971) was a U.S. Supreme Court decision that ruled against the retroactive application of Chimel v. California.The Court also ruled that evidence from mistaken identity arrests can be admissible as long as other factors support probable cause.
New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when a police officer has made a lawful custodial arrest of the occupant of an automobile, the officer may, as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest, search the passenger compartment of that automobile.