enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Arthur Schopenhauer's view on animal rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Schopenhauer's_view...

    Arthur Schopenhauer was an early defender of animal rights. Arthur Schopenhauer was a 19th-century German philosopher. He was an early defender of animal rights, going against the prevailing idea at the time that animals had no rights and only had instrumental value to humans. According to Schopenhauer, "The assumption that animals are without ...

  3. Animal rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_rights

    The vast majority of animals have no legally recognised rights. [12] Critics of animal rights argue that nonhuman animals are unable to enter into a social contract, and thus cannot have rights, a view summarised by the philosopher Roger Scruton, who writes that only humans have duties, and therefore only humans have rights. [13]

  4. Argument from marginal cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_marginal_cases

    Daniel Dombrowski writes that the argument can be traced to Porphyry's third-century treatise On Abstinence from Eating Animals. [7] Danish philosopher Laurids Smith who was familiar with the arguments of Wilhelm Dietler argued against the idea that animals cannot possess rights because they cannot understand the ideas of right and duty.

  5. Should animals be considered ‘citizens’ like people? Ethical ...

    www.aol.com/animals-considered-citizens-people...

    In order to reduce animal suffering, it might be more effective to encourage people to eat less meat and to buy cruelty-free animal products. But for those who believe in animal rights, that’s ...

  6. The Case for Animal Rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Case_for_Animal_Rights

    The Case for Animal Rights is a 1983 book by the American philosopher Tom Regan, in which the author argues that at least some kinds of non-human animals have moral rights because they are the "subjects-of-a-life", and that these rights adhere to them whether or not they are recognized. [1]

  7. Animal welfare - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_welfare

    Welfarism is often contrasted with the animal rights and animal liberation positions, which hold that animals should not be used by humans and should not be regarded as human property. [7] [9] [116] [117] However, it has been argued that both welfarism and animal liberation only make sense if it is assumed that animals have "subjective welfare".

  8. Former college professor argues animals should be allowed to vote

    www.aol.com/news/former-college-professor-argues...

    Former Rowan University philosophy professor Ioan-Radu Motoarcă argued that animals should have voting rights in a paper he wrote for the journal Analysis. Former college professor argues animals ...

  9. Animal rights movement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_rights_movement

    The animal rights movement, sometimes called the animal liberation, animal personhood, or animal advocacy movement, is a social movement that advocates an end to the rigid moral and legal distinction drawn between human and non-human animals, an end to the status of animals as property, and an end to their use in the research, food, clothing, and entertainment industries.