Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
White-box testing (also known as clear box testing, glass box testing, transparent box testing, and structural testing) is a method of software testing that tests internal structures or workings of an application, as opposed to its functionality (i.e. black-box testing). In white-box testing, an internal perspective of the system is used to ...
The tester chooses inputs to exercise paths through the code and determine the appropriate outputs. This is analogous to testing nodes in a circuit, e.g. in-circuit testing (ICT). While white-box testing can be applied at the unit, integration and system levels of the software testing process, it is usually done at the unit level. It can test ...
The techniques used in white box testing are condition coverage, decision coverage, statement coverage, cyclomatic complexity. The main advantage of white box testing in database testing is that coding errors are detected, so internal bugs in the database can be eliminated. The limitation of white box testing is that SQL statements are not covered.
A white box (or glass box, clear box, or open box) is a subsystem whose internals can be viewed but usually not altered. [1] The term is used in systems engineering , software engineering , and in intelligent user interface design, [ 2 ] [ 3 ] where it is closely related to recent interest in explainable artificial intelligence .
Obfuscation is the obscuring of the intended meaning of communication by making the message difficult to understand, usually with confusing and ambiguous language. The obfuscation might be either unintentional or intentional (although intent usually is connoted), and is accomplished with circumlocution (talking around the subject), the use of jargon (technical language of a profession), and ...
This initial stage in testing normally carried out by the developer who wrote the code and sometimes by a peer using the white box testing technique. Integration testing This stage is carried out in two modes, as a complete package or as an increment to the earlier package. Most of the time black box testing technique is used.
This early fuzzing would now be called black box, generational, unstructured (dumb or "classic") fuzzing. According to Prof. Barton Miller, "In the process of writing the project description, I needed to give this kind of testing a name. I wanted a name that would evoke the feeling of random, unstructured data.
ISVV goes beyond "traditional" verification and validation techniques, applied by development teams. While the latter aims to ensure that the software performs well against the nominal requirements, ISVV is focused on non-functional requirements such as robustness and reliability, and on conditions that can lead the software to fail.