enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of free and open-source software licenses

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_free_and...

    FOSS stands for "Free and Open Source Software". There is no one universally agreed-upon definition of FOSS software and various groups maintain approved lists of licenses. The Open Source Initiative (OSI) is one such organization keeping a list of open-source licenses. [1] The Free Software Foundation (FSF) maintains a list of what it ...

  3. Open-source license - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_license

    Popular open source licenses include the Apache License, the MIT License, the GNU General Public License (GPL), the BSD Licenses, the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) and the Mozilla Public License (MPL). Open-source licenses are software licenses that allow content to be used, modified, and shared. They facilitate free and open-source ...

  4. Permissive software license - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permissive_software_license

    The Open Source Initiative defines a permissive software license as a "non-copyleft license that guarantees the freedoms to use, modify and redistribute". [6] GitHub's choosealicense website describes the permissive MIT license as "[letting] people do anything they want with your code as long as they provide attribution back to you and don't hold you liable."

  5. Open-source software - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software

    This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 24 December 2024. Software licensed to ensure source code usage rights Open-source software shares similarities with free software and is part of the broader term free and open-source software. For broader coverage of this topic, see open-source-software movement. It has been suggested that this article ...

  6. Source-available software - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source-available_software

    The following source-available software licenses are considered non-free licenses because they have limitations that prevent them from being open-source according to the Open Source Initiative and free to the Free Software Foundation.

  7. Open source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source

    Licenses which only permit non-commercial redistribution or modification of the source code for personal use only are generally not considered as open-source licenses. However, open-source licenses may have some restrictions, particularly regarding the expression of respect to the origin of software, such as a requirement to preserve the name ...

  8. Free and open-source software - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_and_open-source_software

    "Free and open-source software" (FOSS) is an umbrella term for software that is considered free software and/or open-source software. [1] The precise definition of the terms "free software" and "open-source software" applies them to any software distributed under terms that allow users to use, modify, and redistribute said software in any manner they see fit, without requiring that they pay ...

  9. ISC license - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISC_license

    When initially released, the license did not include the term "and/or", which was changed from "and" by ISC in 2007. [12]Paul Vixie stated on the BIND mailing list that the ISC license started using the term "and/or" to avoid controversy similar to the events surrounding the University of Washington's refusal to allow distribution of the Pine email software. [12]