Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Oracle requested a judgement as a matter of law (JMOL) that the case dismiss any fair use defense since the jury was split, as well as to overturn the jury's decision on eight security-related files that they had reviewed and found non-infringing but which Google had stated they copied verbatim; Alsup concurred.
On March 27, 2018, in Oracle America, Inc. v. Google LLC , the Federal Circuit overturned a jury verdict in favor of Google from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
In 2018, Oracle America Inc v. Google LLC was adjudicated by the United States Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. The case concerned Google's fair use of source code licensed by Oracle under the GNU GPL Version 2. Google had copied 37 Application Programming Interface packages (APIs) to aid in building its free Android software for smartphones ...
The Supreme Court will hear arguments tomorrow in Google v. Oracle. This case raises a fundamental question for software developers and the open-source community: Whether copyright may prevent ...
The Supreme Court ruled that Google’s use of 11,500 lines of code from Oracle software programming language was a “fair use,” a decision that may have implications for how copyrighted ...
It also amounts to prima facie leveraging of Google's dominance in Play Store to protect the relevant market such as Google Search (Online Search Engine) in contravention of Section 4(2)(e) of the Competition Act, 2002. Mobile search has emerged as a key gateway for users to access information and Android is a key delivery channel for mobile ...
A few months ago, Oracle (ORCL) rocked the Internet world by suing Google for patent infringement based on the Android system's use of Java. The suit was surprising for a few reasons: The Java ...
Google urged the high court to rule its copying of Oracle's Java programming language to create the Android operating system was permissible under U.S. copyright law. A jury cleared Google in 2016 ...