enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Philip Morris - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Philip_Morris

    United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. [1] was a case in which the United States District Court for the District of Columbia held several major tobacco companies liable for violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) Act [2] by engaging in numerous acts of fraud to further a conspiracy to deceive the American public about nicotine addiction and the health effects ...

  3. US regulatory power faces fresh test as new Supreme Court ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-regulatory-power-faces-fresh...

    A case involving the vape industry gives the U.S. Supreme Court a chance to further erode the authority of federal regulatory agencies following other major rulings as the justices gird for a new ...

  4. US Supreme Court rejects tobacco firms' appeal over graphic ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-sidesteps...

    In a separate case involving the FDA, the Supreme Court on Dec. 2 is set to hear arguments over the agency's denial of applications to sell flavored vape products. (Reporting by John Kruzel ...

  5. FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FDA_v._Brown_&_Williamson...

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) attempted to regulate tobacco products. Tobacco companies, including Brown & Williamson and Philip Morris Companies (among others), challenged the regulations. [1] The District Court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's claim. The Circuit Court reversed, ruling for the tobacco company.

  6. Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobacco_Master_Settlement...

    The tobacco companies were successful against these lawsuits. Only two plaintiffs ever prevailed, and both of those decisions were reversed on appeal. [5] As scientific evidence mounted in the 1980s, tobacco companies claimed contributory negligence as they asserted adverse health effects were previously unknown or lacked substantial credibility.

  7. Feds file lawsuits against Columbus company, others for ...

    www.aol.com/news/feds-file-lawsuits-against...

    The government alleges the companies caused tobacco products to become ‘adulterated and misbranded.’ Here’s more. Feds file lawsuits against Columbus company, others for unauthorized vaping ...

  8. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cipollone_v._Liggett_Group...

    In a split opinion, the Court held that the Surgeon General's warning did not preclude lawsuits by smokers against tobacco companies on the basis of several claims. [ citation needed ] The case examined whether tobacco companies could be liable for not warning the consumer "adequately" of the dangers of cigarettes as well as ultimately held the ...

  9. Man injured by exploding vape wins $2.3 million in Missouri ...

    www.aol.com/man-injured-exploding-vape-wins...

    A Missouri man injured by an exploding vape recently won more than $2.3 million in a lawsuit against the company that supplied the device’s battery, court documents show.z ... the man was ...