Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Microsoft Academic gained prominence because it profiled authors, organizations, keywords, and journals [4] and made the dataset available as open data, in contrast to Google Scholar. The search engine indexed over 260 million publications, [ 5 ] 88 million of which are journal articles.
The main academic full-text databases are open archives or link-resolution services, although others operate under different models such as mirroring or hybrid publishers. . Such services typically provide access to full text and full-text search, but also metadata about items for which no full text is availa
Microsoft Academic Search was a research project and academic search engine retired in 2012. It relaunched in 2016 as Microsoft Academic , which in turn was shut down in 2022. The content of the latter was allegedly incorporated into The Lens .
ResearchGate's competitors include Academia.edu, Google Scholar, and Mendeley, [4] as well as new competitors that emerged in the last decade like Semantic Scholar. In 2016, Academia.edu reportedly had more registered users (about 34 million versus 11 million [ 25 ] ) and higher web traffic, but ResearchGate was substantially larger in terms of ...
Microsoft Bing: Shut down in 2018 Ms. Dewey: Microsoft Bing: January 2009 Groovle: Google: Taken over by Google after Google sued for name similarity MySpace Search: Google: Function taken over by Google in 2006 Mystery Seeker: Google: Novelty "search"; went offline in 2017 Netscape: Google: Now redirects to AOL Ripple: Google: as of 2017 at ...
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella warned on Monday of a “nightmare” scenario for the internet if Google’s dominance in online search is allowed to continue, a situation, he said, that starts with ...
Live Search Academic was a Web search engine for scholarly literature that existed from April 2006 to May 2008; it was part of Microsoft's Live Search group of services. It was similar to Google Scholar, but rather than crawling the Internet for academic content, search results came directly from trusted sources, such as publishers of academic journals.
Semantic Scholar is free to use and unlike similar search engines (i.e. Google Scholar) does not search for material that is behind a paywall. [ 5 ] [ citation needed ] One study compared the index scope of Semantic Scholar to Google Scholar, and found that for the papers cited by secondary studies in computer science, the two indices had ...