Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Proposition 65 was a California ballot proposition on the November 8, 2016 ballot that would have redirected money collected by grocery and certain other retail stores through mandated sale of carryout bags, and required stores to deposit bag sale proceeds into a special fund to support specified environmental projects.
California Proposition 65 may refer to: California Proposition 65 (1986) (passed) The Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986. Requires public notice of products containing dangerous or carcinogenic chemicals. California Proposition 65 (2004) (failed) would have protected local jurisdiction revenues from state government encroachment.
1986 protest against Proposition 65 California Proposition 65 warning before August 31, 2018 [2]. In 1986, political strategists including Tom Hayden and his wife, environmental activist Jane Fonda, thought that an initiative addressing toxic pollutants would bring more left leaning voters to the polls to help Democrat Tom Bradley in his gubernatorial race against incumbent Republican George ...
Proposition 65, formally known as the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, requires the state of California to maintain and update a list of chemicals that have been linked to ...
Invalidates Proposition 62 if passed by a larger proportion of the popular vote. [24] [40] 67: Passed Referendum to Ban Single-Use Plastic Bags. This is a referendum on a law signed by the Governor on September 30, 2014, that would impose a statewide ban on the distribution of single-use plastic bags at grocery stores. [24] [41]
For nearly a decade, Senate Bill 270 has banned California stores from providing single-use carryout plastic bags — with the exception of allowing customers to purchase a thicker “reusable ...
The following is a list of chemicals published as a requirement of Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, commonly known as California Proposition 65, that are "known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity" as of January 3, 2020. [1]
Cohen added that California policymakers “should aim to expand the California Dream, not simply to restore it, recognizing that the 20th century ideal was always largely out of reach for Black ...