enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Continuance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuance

    Unless the defendant consents in writing to the contrary, a trial may not commence less than 30 days from the date when the defendant first appears through counsel or expressly waives counsel or elects to proceed pro se (without a lawyer). [17] [18] Case law of the Speedy Trial Act is found in 16 ALR 4th p. 1283 et seq. [8] [19]

  3. Bengoshi no Kuzu - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengoshi_no_Kuzu

    In 2010, the manga was re-titled Bengoshi no Kuzu Dai-2 Shin, and continued until June 2014. The overall series' chapters were collected in 21 tankōbon volumes. The series follows Mami Takeda, a new lawyer, and her partnership with fellow attorney Motohito Kuzu, as they deal with challenging court cases.

  4. Pre-trial detention - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-trial_detention

    The pre-charge detention period is the period of time during which an individual can be held and questioned by police, prior to being charged with an offence. [5] Not all countries have such a concept, and in those that do, the period for which a person may be detained without charge varies by jurisdiction.

  5. United States v. Handley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Handley

    United States v. Handley, 564 F. Supp. 2d 996 (2008), was a court case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa involving obscenity charges stemming from the importation of manga featuring pornographic depictions of fictional minors.

  6. The Law of Ueki - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Law_of_Ueki

    The Law of Ueki (Japanese: うえきの法則, Hepburn: Ueki no Hōsoku) is a Japanese manga series written and illustrated by Tsubasa Fukuchi. It was serialized in Shogakukan 's shōnen manga magazine Weekly Shōnen Sunday from July 2001 to October 2004, with its chapters collected in 16 tankōbon volumes.

  7. Illinois v. Allen - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._Allen

    Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. 337 (1970), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the removal of an unruly criminal defendant during his trial. In its decision, the court ruled that a trial judge may remove a stubbornly defiant defendant from the courtroom, following a warning from the judge that he will be removed if his disruptive behavior continues.

  8. Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiibel_v._Sixth_Judicial...

    Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, 542 U.S. 177 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a statute requiring suspects to disclose their names during a valid Terry stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment if the statute first requires reasonable suspicion of criminal involvement, and does not violate the Fifth Amendment if there is no ...

  9. Tokyo Metropolitan Ordinance Regarding the Healthy ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokyo_Metropolitan...

    The original proposal was criticized by a group of manga artists, who prepared a statement for the Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly signed by many anime and manga industry personnel opposing the legislation. [7] After Bill 156 passed through committee, Shueisha's management tried to calm worries for