Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Various forms of the end-of-proof symbol. In mathematics, the tombstone, halmos, end-of-proof, or Q.E.D. symbol "∎" (or " ") is a symbol used to denote the end of a proof, in place of the traditional abbreviation "Q.E.D." for the Latin phrase "quod erat demonstrandum".
The up tack or falsum (⊥, \bot in LaTeX, U+22A5 in Unicode [1]) is a constant symbol used to represent: . The truth value 'false', or a logical constant denoting a proposition in logic that is always false (often called "falsum" or "absurdum").
In logic, a set of symbols is commonly used to express logical representation. The following table lists many common symbols, together with their name, how they should be read out loud, and the related field of mathematics.
Fermat's last theorem Fermat's last theorem, one of the most famous and difficult to prove theorems in number theory, states that for any integer n > 2, the equation a n + b n = c n has no positive integer solutions. Fermat's little theorem Fermat's little theorem field extension A field extension L/K is a pair of fields K and L such that K is ...
= non-theorem, does not yield; U+22AC ⊬ DOES NOT PROVE (⊬) ≡ 22A2⊢ 0338$̸; On a typewriter, a turnstile can be composed from a vertical bar (|) and a dash (–). In LaTeX there is a turnstile package which issues this sign in many ways, and is capable of putting labels below or above it, in the correct places. [16]
In this case, the intermediate value theorem states that f must have a root in the interval [a, b]. This theorem can be proved by considering the set S = {s ∈ [a, b] : f (x) < 0 for all x ≤ s} . That is, S is the initial segment of [a, b] that takes negative values under f.
In the geometry of numbers, the subspace theorem was obtained by Wolfgang M. Schmidt in 1972. [6] It states that if n is a positive integer, and L 1,...,L n are linearly independent linear forms in n variables with algebraic coefficients and if ε>0 is any given real number, then the non-zero integer points x in n coordinates with
Boolos (1989) built on a formalized version of Berry's paradox to prove Gödel's incompleteness theorem in a new and much simpler way. The basic idea of his proof is that a proposition that holds of x if and only if x = n for some natural number n can be called a definition for n , and that the set {( n , k ): n has a definition that is k ...