Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Compared to weighted algorithm, this randomness halved the number of mistakes the algorithm is going to make. [9] However, it is important to note that in some research, people define η = 1 / 2 {\displaystyle \eta =1/2} in weighted majority algorithm and allow 0 ≤ η ≤ 1 {\displaystyle 0\leq \eta \leq 1} in randomized weighted majority ...
The score is greater than 0 if it is more likely to be a functional site than a random site, and less than 0 if it is more likely to be a random site than a functional site. [1] The sequence score can also be interpreted in a physical framework as the binding energy for that sequence.
The decision-matrix method, also Pugh method or Pugh concept selection, invented by Stuart Pugh, [1] is a qualitative technique used to rank the multi-dimensional options of an option set. It is frequently used in engineering for making design decisions but can also be used to rank investment options, vendor options, product options or any ...
Here (assuming the first scoring system) more importance is given to the Ts matching than the As, i.e. the Ts matching is assumed to be more significant to the alignment. This weighting based on letters also applies to mismatches. In order to represent all the possible combinations of letters and their resulting scores a similarity matrix is used.
In decision theory, the weighted sum model (WSM), [1] [2] also called weighted linear combination (WLC) [3] or simple additive weighting (SAW), [4] is the best known and simplest multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) / multi-criteria decision making method for evaluating a number of alternatives in terms of a number of decision criteria.
The weighted product model (WPM) is a popular multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) / multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method. It is similar to the weighted sum model (WSM) in that it produces a simple score, but has the very important advantage of overcoming the issue of 'adding apples and pears' i.e. adding together quantities measured in different units.
There are many variations of the weighted majority algorithm to handle different situations, like shifting targets, infinite pools, or randomized predictions. The core mechanism remains similar, with the final performances of the compound algorithm bounded by a function of the performance of the specialist (best performing algorithm) in the pool.
In words the formula reads: matrix (,) is subtracted from matrix and the resulting matrix is scaled (weighted) by the diagonal matrices and . Multiplying the resulting matrix by the diagonal matrices is equivalent to multiply the i-th row (or column) of it by the i-th element of the diagonal of W m {\displaystyle W_{m}} or W n ...