Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In semantics, contrast is a relationship between two discourse segments. [citation needed] ... and replacing one with the other creates a difference in meaning. [1] ...
They discerned different kinds of words by their semantic and syntactic roles, such as the contrast between names, common nouns, and verbs. They also discussed the difference between statements, commands, and prohibitions. [136] Bhartṛhari developed and compared various semantic theories of the meaning of words. [137]
Componential analysis is a method typical of structural semantics which analyzes the components of a word's meaning. Thus, it reveals the culturally important features by which speakers of the language distinguish different words in a semantic field or domain (Ottenheimer, 2006, p. 20).
Additionally, Fauconnier semantics distinguishes between roles and values. A semantic role is understood to be description of a category, while values are the instances that make up the category. (In this sense, the role-value distinction is a special case of the type-token distinction.) Fauconnier argues that curious semantic constructions can ...
A semantic field can thus be very large or very small, depending on the level of contrast being made between lexical items. While cat and dog both fall under the larger semantic field of animal, including the breed of dog, like German shepherd, would require contrasts between other breeds of dog (e.g. corgi , or poodle ), thus expanding the ...
The term semantic feature is usually used interchangeably with the term semantic component. [9] Additionally, semantic features/semantic components are also often referred to as semantic properties. [10] The theory of componential analysis and semantic features is not the only approach to analyzing the semantic structure of words.
Semantic change (also semantic shift, semantic progression, semantic development, or semantic drift) is a form of language change regarding the evolution of word usage—usually to the point that the modern meaning is radically different from the original usage.
The relationships between nouns and their containing structures are of both syntactic and semantic value. The syntactic positional relationships between forms in sentences vary cross-linguistically and allows grammarians to observe semantic values in these nouns by examining their syntactic values. Using these semantic values gives the base for ...