enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Argument from ignorance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

    John Locke (1632–1704), the likely originator of the term.. Argument from ignorance (Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), or appeal to ignorance, [a] is an informal fallacy where something is claimed to be true or false because of a lack of evidence to the contrary.

  3. Wikipedia:Common sense is not original research - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Common_sense_is...

    The vast majority of articles on Wikipedia fall in this category, where they revolve around some sort of conclusion, whether widely accepted or not, backed up by a number of facts. Because of the diverse audience (literally every person on the planet is a potential reader), it is a given that there will many different viewpoints, the majority ...

  4. False accusation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation

    When there is insufficient supporting evidence to determine whether it is true or false, an accusation is described as "unsubstantiated" or "unfounded". Accusations that are determined to be false based on corroborating evidence can be divided into three categories: [2] A completely false allegation, in that the alleged events did not occur.

  5. Burden of proof (philosophy) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)

    The party that does not carry the burden of proof carries the benefit of assumption of being correct, they are presumed to be correct, until the burden shifts after presentation of evidence by the party bringing the action. An example is in an American criminal case, where there is a presumption of innocence by the defendant. Fulfilling the ...

  6. Further research is needed - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Further_research_is_needed

    Indeed, authors may recommend "further research" when, given the existing evidence, further research would be extremely unlikely to be approved by an ethics committee. [ 3 ] Studies finding that a treatment has no noticeable effects are sometimes greeted with statements that "more research is needed" by those convinced that the treatment is ...

  7. Pseudoscience - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscience

    The scientists should not have personal reasons to expect certain results. Universality: No person should be able to more easily obtain the information of a test than another person. Social class, religion, ethnicity, or any other personal factors should not be factors in someone's ability to receive or perform a type of science.

  8. UN-backed human rights experts decry new evidence of ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/un-backed-human-rights-experts...

    U.N.-backed human rights experts said Friday they have gathered new evidence of “horrific” torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war by their Russian jailers, saying such practices could amount to ...

  9. Anecdotal evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence

    In the legal sphere, anecdotal evidence, if it passes certain legal requirements and is admitted as testimony, is a common form of evidence used in a court of law. Often this form of anecdotal evidence is the only evidence presented at trial. [30] Scientific evidence in a court of law is called physical evidence, but this is much rarer ...