Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
S. 517 would repeal a rule published in October 2012 by the Librarian of Congress (LOC) that limited the ability of certain owners of wireless telephone handsets to "unlock" their phones, that is, to circumvent software protections that prevent the owner from connecting to a different wireless network. The bill would reinstate an earlier rule ...
Gov. Newsom signed the Phone-Free Schools Act into law. It requires California school districts to draft policies restricting or banning student cellphone use.
The school has banned cell phones during school hours, including lunch, since 2022. The problem and how they fixed it Middle school students coming back to campus in 2021 were used to being ...
Here's are the details of California's Phone-Free Schools Act, approved by lawmakers and sent to Gov. Gavin Newsom. Get ready for a massive change for cellphone-obsessed students.
However, the collective use of cell phones in schools poses other technological challenges. Some schools reported that allowing all students to use cell phones at the same time slows down school bandwidth speeds, and hence some schools have blocked phones from accessing the school Wi-Fi. [90]
European Union adopted a set of right-to-repair rules [43] Aims to make it easier and more cost-effective for consumers to repair their goods. The rules are not yet finalized as they must be adopted by member states and approved by the Council. [43] They seek to incentivize repair instead of replacement for consumer devices. [44] 2024
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), [1] is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court ruled that the warrantless search and seizure of the digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment.