Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
1.68781 feet per second (approximately). The length of the internationally agreed nautical mile is 1 852 m . The US adopted the international definition in 1954, having previously used the US nautical mile ( 1 853 .248 m ). [ 6 ]
It is defined as the area of a square with sides of one yard (three feet, thirty-six inches, 0.9144 metres) ... ≈0.000000322830579 square miles; ... 1.00969 gaj [1]
The first equation shows that, after one second, an object will have fallen a distance of 1/2 × 9.8 × 1 2 = 4.9 m. After two seconds it will have fallen 1/2 × 9.8 × 2 2 = 19.6 m; and so on. On the other hand, the penultimate equation becomes grossly inaccurate at great distances.
The original Naismith's rule from 1892 says that one should allow one hour per three miles on the map and an additional hour per 2000 feet of ascent. [1] [4] It is included in the last sentence of his report from a trip. [1] [8] Today it is formulated in many ways. Naismith's 1 h / 3 mi + 1 h / 2000 ft can be replaced by:
The top speed of a sloth. 10 −1: 0.2778: 1: 0.6214: 9.2657 × 10 −10: 1 km/h. 0.44704: 1.609344: 1: 1.4912 × 10 −9: 1 mph. 0.5144: 1.852: 1.151: 1.716 × 10 −9: 1 knot (nautical mile per hour) 10 0: 1.2: 4.32: 2.68: 4 × 10 −9: Typical scanning speed of an audio compact disc; the speed of signals (action potentials) traveling along ...
In aviation, the rule of three or "3:1 rule of descent" is a rule of thumb that 3 nautical miles (5.6 km) of travel should be allowed for every 1,000 feet (300 m) of descent. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] For example, a descent from flight level 350 would require approximately 35x3=105 nautical miles.
By 1875, the average value of the guz in Bengal was 36 inches (1.0 yd; 910 mm), but was 33 inches (840 mm) in Madras and 27 inches (690 mm) in Bombay. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] By the 20th century, the guz was uniformly quoted as being equal in length to one yard in the English system , or 0.91 metres in the metric system . [ 3 ]
Using the integral form of Gauss's Law, this formula can be extended to any pair of objects of which one is far more massive than the other — like a planet relative to any man-scale artifact. The distances between planets and between the planets and the Sun are (by many orders of magnitude) larger than the sizes of the sun and the planets.