Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The lawsuit also alleges they had to work much harder to be promoted, or were passed over entirely. Some women employees reported being denied promotions due to fears they might become pregnant, being reprimanded for needing to go pick up their children, and being kicked out of lactation rooms by male colleagues who wanted to meet in the room. [1]
The CROWN (Create a Respectful and Open Workplace for Natural Hair) Act (SB 188) is a California law which prohibits discrimination based on hair style and hair texture by extending protection under the FEHA and the California Education Code. It is the first legislation passed at the state level in the United States to prohibit such discrimination.
unemployment insurance benefits during pregnancy: Supreme Court of Canada: 1978 Califano v. Goldfarb: protection afforded wage earners for surviving spouses: Supreme Court of the United States: 1977 Canada (AG) v Lavell: Indian status retained or lost by Indian women marrying non-Indian men: Supreme Court of Canada: 1973 Chen-Oster v. Goldman ...
New workplace laws taking effect in January strengthening employees' health, safety and wage protections and ban corporate muzzling of discrimination victims. But many more mandates tagged "job ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Lawsuit accuses Apple of gender discrimination, unequal pay for women in California Updated June 14, 2024 at 2:07 PM Apple is reportedly being sued by two employees who are accusing the tech giant ...
Wal-Mart v. Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that a group of roughly 1.5 million women could not be certified as a valid class of plaintiffs in a class-action lawsuit for employment discrimination against Walmart. Lead plaintiff Betty Dukes, a Walmart employee, and others alleged gender ...
Juarez v. AutoZone Stores, Inc., Case No. 08-CV-00417-WVG (S.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2014), was a court case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California which is believed to be the largest single-plaintiff employment verdict in United States history at $185,872,719.52.