enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Express_Corp._v...

    Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki, 552 U.S. 389 (2008), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 27, 2008. The ruling provided guidance on what would constitute an adequate filing under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA).

  3. Employment discrimination against persons with criminal ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_discrimination...

    Employment discrimination against persons with criminal records in the United States has been illegal since enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [citation needed] Employers retain the right to lawfully consider an applicant's or employee's criminal conviction(s) for employment purposes e.g., hiring, retention, promotion, benefits, and delegated duties.

  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swierkiewicz_v._Sorema_N._A.

    Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U.S. 506 (2002), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 26, 2002. The Court held that for complaints in employment discrimination cases, a plaintiff is not required to allege specific facts that establish a prima facie case as required by the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework.

  5. FCC v. AT&T Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_v._AT&T_Inc.

    Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T Inc., 562 U.S. 397 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case on aspects of corporate personhood.It held that the exemption from Freedom of Information Act disclosure requirements for law enforcement records which "could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy" does not protect information related to ...

  6. Garrity v. New Jersey - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garrity_v._New_Jersey

    Garrity v. New Jersey , 385 U.S. 493 (1967), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that law enforcement officers and other public employees have the right to be free from compulsory self-incrimination. [ 1 ]

  7. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_Corp._v...

    McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), is a US employment law case by the United States Supreme Court regarding the burdens and nature of proof in proving a Title VII case and the order in which plaintiffs and defendants present proof. It was the seminal case in the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework.

  8. Fatal beating of Black inmate at New York prison sparks ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/fatal-beating-black-inmate-york...

    Protesters hold up signs reading “Black Lives Matter” and “Justice for Robert Brooks” days after a disturbing video of the Black inmate’s fatal beating in New York

  9. Thornburg v. Gingles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thornburg_v._Gingles

    Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30 (1986), was a United States Supreme Court case in which a unanimous Court found that "the legacy of official discrimination ... acted in concert with the multimember districting scheme to impair the ability of "cohesive groups of black voters to participate equally in the political process and to elect candidates of their choice."

  1. Related searches constitute vs reconstitute full case of discrimination law enforcement report

    eeoc employment discriminationemployment discrimination against person with criminal record
    employment discrimination against persons