enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Military tribunals in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_tribunals_in_the...

    The Union used military tribunals during and in the immediate aftermath of the American Civil War. [2] Military tribunals were used to try Native Americans who fought the United States during those Indian Wars which occurred during the Civil War; the thirty-eight people who were executed after the Dakota War of 1862 were sentenced by a military ...

  3. Courts-martial of the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courts-martial_of_the...

    The Spirit of Democracy, Woodsfield, Ohio, March 8, 1865. Courts-martial of the United States are trials conducted by the U.S. military or by state militaries. Most commonly, courts-martial are convened to try members of the U.S. military for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).

  4. Detention, Treatment, and Trial of Certain Non-Citizens in ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detention,_Treatment,_and...

    US District Court Justice James Robertson ruled, in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, that the military commissions were unconstitutional. A three-judge appeals panel overturned Robertson's ruling. President Bush appointed John Roberts, one of the judges on that panel, to the vacant post of Chief Justice of the United States on the next

  5. Ex parte Milligan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_parte_Milligan

    Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. (4 Wall.) 2 (1866), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that ruled that the use of military tribunals to try civilians when civil courts are operating is unconstitutional.

  6. Reid v. Covert - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reid_v._Covert

    Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957), was a 6–2 landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court holding that United States citizen civilians outside of the territorial jurisdiction of the United States cannot be tried by a United States military tribunal, but instead retain the protections guaranteed by the United States Constitution, in this case, trial by jury.

  7. Hamdan v. Rumsfeld - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld

    Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that military commissions set up by the Bush administration to try detainees at Guantanamo Bay violated both the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and the Geneva Conventions ratified by the U.S. [1]

  8. Trump’s enemies list: The political rivals and organizations ...

    www.aol.com/trump-enemies-list-political-rivals...

    A war between China and the United States could have been the result of this treasonous act.” Nancy Pelosi The former Democratic House speaker Nancy Pelosi has been a regular target of Trump’s .

  9. Al Odah v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Odah_v._United_States

    On December 30, 2005, Congress passed the Detainee Treatment Act (DTA). In accordance with the Bush administration goals, the DTA removed Guantanamo habeas corpus cases from the jurisdiction of the US Circuit Court for D.C. and gave authority over these cases to the CSRT and military commission system set up by the Department of Defense.