Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
C# is a language in which the null object pattern can be properly implemented. This example shows animal objects that display sounds and a NullAnimal instance used in place of the C# null keyword. The null object provides consistent behaviour and prevents a runtime null reference exception that would occur if the C# null keyword were used instead.
C# 6.0 and above have ?., the null-conditional member access operator (which is also called the Elvis operator by Microsoft and is not to be confused with the general usage of the term Elvis operator, whose equivalent in C# is ??, the null coalescing operator) and ?[], the null-conditional element access operator, which performs a null-safe call of an indexer get accessor.
In Java, the multiton pattern can be implemented using an enumerated type, with the values of the type corresponding to the instances. In the case of an enumerated type with a single value, this gives the singleton pattern. In C#, we can also use enums, as the following example shows:
The original form of the pattern, appearing in Pattern Languages of Program Design 3, [2] has data races, depending on the memory model in use, and it is hard to get right. Some consider it to be an anti-pattern. [3] There are valid forms of the pattern, including the use of the volatile keyword in Java and explicit memory barriers in C++. [4]
An example of the application of marker interfaces from the Java programming language is the Serializable interface: package java.io ; public interface Serializable { } A class implements this interface to indicate that its non- transient data members can be written to an ObjectOutputStream .
This allows C#, unlike Java, to support objects with encapsulation that are not reference types. In Java, compound types are synonymous with reference types; methods cannot be defined for a type unless it is also a class reference type. In C# the concepts of encapsulation and methods have been decoupled from the reference requirement so that a ...
The examples are still bad, though. The C example misses the concept entirely (the pattern requires the concept of objects, so I don't know that this pattern can be implemented in C) and while an empty C# array may exhibit similar behavior to a null object, it certainly isn't a good example of the practical use of the pattern.
In a software design pattern view, lazy initialization is often used together with a factory method pattern. This combines three ideas: This combines three ideas: Using a factory method to create instances of a class ( factory method pattern )