enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Maryland v. Craig - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maryland_v._Craig

    Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990), was a U.S. Supreme Court case involving the Sixth Amendment.The Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause, which provides criminal defendants with the right to confront witnesses against them, did not bar the use of one-way closed-circuit television to present testimony by an alleged child sex abuse victim.

  3. United States v. Drew - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Drew

    United States v. Drew, 259 F.R.D. 449 (C.D. Cal. 2009), [1] was an American federal criminal case in which the U.S. government charged Lori Drew with violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) over her alleged cyberbullying of her 13-year-old neighbor, Megan Meier, who had died of suicide.

  4. Paroline v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paroline_v._United_States

    Paroline v. United States, 572 U.S. 434 (2014), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that to recover restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 2259, the government or the victim must establish a causal relationship between the defendant's conduct and the victim's harm or damages.

  5. Personal jurisdiction in Internet cases in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_jurisdiction_in...

    In contrast, specific personal jurisdiction allows a defendant to be sued in a forum only on the basis of the defendant's contacts with the forum. A court can establish specific jurisdiction over a defendant only if he or she has "certain minimum contacts" which give rise to the action in question in the forum such that the exercise of ...

  6. Zeran v. America Online, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeran_v._America_Online,_Inc.

    Zeran v. America Online, Inc., 129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir. 1997), [2] is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit determined the immunity of Internet service providers for wrongs committed by their users under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

  7. Carey v. Musladin - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carey_v._Musladin

    At issue was whether a criminal defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial was violated when relatives of the alleged victim were permitted to sit in the courtroom as spectators during the trial, wearing buttons that displayed the victim's image. The Supreme Court ruled that the state court did not unreasonably apply clearly established ...

  8. McNally v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McNally_v._United_States

    McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350 (1987), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that the federal statute criminalizing mail fraud applied only to the schemes and artifices defrauding victims of money or property, as opposed to those defrauding citizens of their rights to good government.

  9. Abuse of process - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abuse_of_process

    An abuse of process is the unjustified or unreasonable use of legal proceedings or process to further a cause of action by an applicant or plaintiff in an action. It is a claim made by the respondent or defendant that the other party is misusing or perverting regularly issued court process (civil or criminal) not justified by the underlying legal action.