enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Gundy v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gundy_v._United_States

    Gundy v. United States, No. 17-6086, 588 U.S. 128 (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that 42 U.S.C. § 16913(d), part of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act ("SORNA"), does not violate the nondelegation doctrine.

  3. DeShaney v. Winnebago County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeShaney_v._Winnebago_County

    DeShaney v. Winnebago County, 489 U.S. 189 (1989), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 22, 1989. The court held that a state government agency's failure to prevent child abuse by a custodial parent does not violate the child's right to liberty for the purposes of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

  4. Gamble v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamble_v._United_States

    Gamble v. United States, No. 17-646, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case about the separate sovereignty exception to the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which allows both federal and state prosecution of the same crime as the governments are "separate sovereigns".

  5. Constitutionality of sex offender registries in the United ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutionality_of_sex...

    The constitutionality of sex offender registries in the United States has been challenged on a number of state and federal constitutional grounds. While the Supreme Court of the United States has twice upheld sex offender registration laws, in 2015 it vacated a requirement that an offender submit to lifetime ankle-bracelet monitoring, finding it was a Fourth Amendment search that was later ...

  6. Paroline v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paroline_v._United_States

    18 U.S.C. § 2259. Paroline v. United States, 572 U.S. 434 (2014), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that to recover restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 2259, the government or the victim must establish a causal relationship between the defendant's conduct and the victim's harm or damages. The decision vacated the appellate ...

  7. Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy_v._National...

    Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, No. 16-476, 584 U.S. 453 (2018) [138 S. Ct. 1461], was a United States Supreme Court case involving the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The issue was whether the U.S. federal government has the right to control state lawmaking.

  8. Jordan Brown case - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan_Brown_case

    On May 8, 2013, the Superior Court vacated the finding of delinquency, citing "palpable abuse of discretion" and sent the case back to juvenile court. On July 18, 2018, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court overturned his conviction in a 5–0 decision. The justices attacked the evidence as insufficient and said that the juvenile trial evidence ...

  9. Child sexual abuse laws in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_sexual_abuse_laws_in...

    The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Kansas v. Hendricks that a predatory sex offender can be civilly committed upon release from prison. [5] The Supreme Court ruled in Stogner v. California that California's ex post facto law, a retroactive extension of the statute of limitations for sexual offenses committed against minors, is unconstitutional. [6]