Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Beall's List is a list kept by Jeffrey Beall of questionable and shady open-access scientific journals. Articles in journals on Beall's List are presumed not reviewed and should usually be treated as blog posts. Esquire, an established American magazine, does not come off too well in this anecdote (from Jacobs, A. J. (2005). The Know-It-All ...
List: biography, education, employment, works, grants, peer-review. Over 9.3 million profiles. Free ORCID Inc. Philosophy Documentation Center eCollection: Applied ethics, Philosophy, Religious studies: Journals, series, conference proceedings, and other works from several countries online Free & Subscription Philosophy Documentation Center
a list of sources that have never been discussed, or whose reliability should be obvious to most editors; a list of primary, secondary, or tertiary sources; a list of independent or affiliated sources; a list of self-published and non–self-published sources; a representative sample of all sources used on Wikipedia or all sources in existence
Resources for sourcing and searching for photographs by the content that is depicted. Though the search engines may be accessed for free, indexed images themselves may be under restricted license. Google Books [3] - Searchable archive of magazines and books (some full-text, including photograph captions and references to photographs from ...
Ideal sources for biomedical information include general or systematic reviews in reliable, independent, published sources, such as reputable medical journals, widely recognised standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or medical guidelines and position statements from nationally or internationally reputable expert bodies.
The American Association for the Advancement of Science's journal Science, along with Nature are among the most notable general scholarly publications; Cell is especially well known in its field of experimental molecular biology. Keep in mind that even a reputable journal may occasionally post a retraction of an experimental result.
This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...
Search the NLM Catalog using jsubsetim[All Fields] to find all Index Medicus journals (5021 journals as of 29 May 2020); or go directly to the search results for all Index Medicus journals. (Note that immediately above "Search Results" on that page, you can change the default "20 per page" to as many as 200 results per page, and you can change ...