enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ashcroft v. Iqbal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Iqbal

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2), 12(b)(6) Iqbal , 556 U.S. 662 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that plaintiffs must present a "plausible" cause of action. Alongside Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (and together known as Twiqbal ), Iqbal raised the threshold which plaintiffs needed to meet.

  3. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_Atlantic_Corp._v._Twombly

    The decision changed the existing interpretation of the notice pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) and the standards for dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) by creating a new, stricter standard of a pleading's required specificity. Previously, under the standard the court set forth in Conley

  4. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Rules_of_Civil...

    Additionally, because 12(b)(1) motions are so fundamental, they may never be waived throughout the course of litigation, and 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(7) motions may be filed at any time until trial ends. Rule 13 describes when a defendant is allowed or required to assert claims against other parties to the suit .

  5. Twiqbal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twiqbal

    Twiqbal is a colloquial term in American law (civil procedure), referring to two separate US Supreme Court cases that heightened the pleading standard under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

  6. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_Securities...

    The defendant will then file a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) is essentially an argument by the defendant that even if all of the facts alleged in the complaint were assumed to be true, they would not be sufficient to give rise to liability under Rule 10b-5.

  7. Abdullahi v. Pfizer, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdullahi_v._Pfizer,_Inc.

    Pfizer cross-appealed denial of its motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court of Appeals reviewed the forum non conveniens dismissal under the "clear abuse of discretion" standard. [citation needed] The Court of Appeals, however, revisited the Court's analysis of the adequate alternative ...

  8. Upgrade to a faster, more secure version of a supported browser. It's free and it only takes a few moments:

  9. Demurrer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demurrer

    The demurrer was replaced by the Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The demurrer was abolished after American lawyers realized that the pleadings should frame only those issues that will be actively litigated through motion practice once both sides have fully stated their positions and ...