Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Also, OMMS 2 =40, since the fractions satisfying / are 1/2, 2/4, 3/5, 4/7, etc., and in all cases, in any partition of C into subsets, the least-valuable subsets do not contain the 60. Therefore, an OMMS-fair allocation might give the 40 to 2 and the 60 to 1, or give nothing to 1, both of which seem unfair.
To change 1 / 3 to a decimal, divide 1.000... by 3 (" 3 into 1.000... "), and stop when the desired accuracy is obtained, e.g., at 4 decimals with 0.3333. The fraction 1 / 4 can be written exactly with two decimal digits, while the fraction 1 / 3 cannot be written exactly as a decimal with a finite number of digits.
[1] [2] Fractions are collected based on differences in a specific property of the individual components. A common trait in fractionations is the need to find an optimum between the amount of fractions collected and the desired purity in each fraction. Fractionation makes it possible to isolate more than two components in a mixture in a single run.
3 ⁄ 4 ″ videocassette, better known as the U-matic format; March 4 (month-day date notation) 3 April (day-month date notation) 3rd Battalion 4th Marines, a unit in the United States Marine Corps; Three fourths, alternative name for Capri pants
The set of rational numbers is not complete. For example, the sequence (1; 1.4; 1.41; 1.414; 1.4142; 1.41421; ...), where each term adds a digit of the decimal expansion of the positive square root of 2, is Cauchy but it does not converge to a rational number (in the real numbers, in contrast, it converges to the positive square root of 2).
Checking whether a given random allocation can be implemented by a lottery over EF1 and PO allocations is NP-hard. Babaioff, Ezra and Feige [16] show: A polynomial-time algorithm for computing allocations that are ex-ante proportional, and ex-post both PROP1 and 1/2-fraction maximin-share (and also 1/2-fraction truncated-proportional share).
In the mid-1960s, to defeat the advantage of the recently introduced computers for the then popular rally racing in the Midwest, competition lag times in a few events were given in centids (1 ⁄ 100 day, 864 seconds, 14.4 minutes), millids (1 ⁄ 1,000 day, 86.4 seconds), and centims (1 ⁄ 100 minute, 0.6 seconds) the latter two looking and ...
In the second step, they were divided by 3. The final result, 4 / 3 , is an irreducible fraction because 4 and 3 have no common factors other than 1. The original fraction could have also been reduced in a single step by using the greatest common divisor of 90 and 120, which is 30. As 120 ÷ 30 = 4, and 90 ÷ 30 = 3, one gets