Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center is an aviation research and development, and test and evaluation facility. The Technical Center serves as the national scientific test base for the Federal Aviation Administration. Technical Center programs include research and development, test and evaluation, and verification and validation in air ...
MIL-STD 1472 DoD Design Criteria Standard for Human Engineering. FAA Human Factors Design Standards (HFDS) HF-STD-001B. HFE Data Information Descriptions: Human Engineering Program Plan (HEPP) DI-HFAC- 81742. Human Engineering Systems Analysis Report (HESAR) DI-HFAC-80745. Human Engineering Design Approach Document (HEDAD-M) DI-HFAC-80747
The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) identifies the human causes of an accident and offers tools for analysis as a way to plan preventive training. [1]
Military Human Factors Archived May 14, 2008, at the Wayback Machine; Crew Resource Management Current Regulatory Paper; Crew Resource Management for the Fire Service Archived July 15, 2011, at the Wayback Machine; TeamSTEPPS Program from the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Flight-crew human factors handbook (CAP 737)
Human-rating certification, also known as man-rating or crew-rating, is the certification of a spacecraft or launch vehicle as capable of safely transporting humans. There is no one particular standard for human-rating a spacecraft or launch vehicle, and the various entities that launch or plan to launch such spacecraft specify requirements for their particular systems to be human-rated.
A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) study of 55 human-factor aviation accidents from 1978 to 1999 concluded that number accidents increased proportionally to the amount of time the captain had been on duty. [7] The accident proportion relative to exposure proportion rose from 0.79 (1–3 hours on duty) to 5.62 ( more than 13 hours on duty).
The FAA Fail-Safe Design Concept and design principles or techniques for safe design are maintained. However, owing to the increasing development of Highly Integrated Systems in aircraft, qualitative controls previously considered necessary for safe software development are extended to the aircraft function level. [6]
An FAA study of the year ending September 2016, found that of 361 runway incursions attributed to pilot deviation, 27 percent resulted from "pilot failed to hold short of runway as instructed", and 14.7 percent from "pilot failed to hold short of runway". 5 percent of pilot deviations were classified as the pilot failing to comply with an ATC ...