enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. PICO process - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PICO_process

    The PICO process (or framework) is a mnemonic used in evidence-based practice (and specifically evidence-based medicine) to frame and answer a clinical or health care related question, [1] though it is also argued that PICO "can be used universally for every scientific endeavour in any discipline with all study designs". [2]

  3. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_reporting_items...

    The PRISMA flow diagram, depicting the flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is an evidence-based minimum set of items aimed at helping scientific authors to report a wide array of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, primarily used to assess the benefits and harms of a health care ...

  4. IMRAD - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMRAD

    In scientific writing, IMRAD or IMRaD (/ ˈ ɪ m r æ d /) (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) [1] is a common organizational structure for the format of a document. IMRaD is the most prominent norm for the structure of a scientific journal article of the original research type.

  5. APA style - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APA_style

    A typical APA-style research paper fulfills 3 levels of specification. Level 1 states how a research paper must be organized by including a title page, an abstract, an introduction, the methodology, the results, a discussion, and references. In addition, formatting of abstracts and title pages must be as per the APA manual of style.

  6. Scientific writing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_writing

    The method section is where scientific writers explain the procedure of the experiment or research. In "Results," writers who follow the IMRaD format share, with neutrality, the experimental results, which in "Discussion," are compared with prior information to end with a conclusion about the research, which should be 3 to 5 paragraphs long and ...

  7. Template:Original research/doc - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Original_research/doc

    This template will categorize articles into Category:Articles that may contain original research or one of the dated sub-categories. Note: This template should not be applied without explanation on the talk page, and should be removed if the original research is not readily apparent when no explanation is given.

  8. Wikipedia : Manual of Style/Layout

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/...

    Box-type templates (such as {{Commons category}}, shown here for the c:Category:Wikipedia logos at Commons) have to be put at the beginning of the last section of the article so that boxes will appear next to, rather than below, the list items. (Do not make a section whose sole content is box-type templates.)

  9. Models of scientific inquiry - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Models_of_scientific_inquiry

    The deductive argument is called an explanation, its premisses are called the explanans (L: explaining) and the conclusion is called the explanandum (L: to be explained). Depending on a number of additional qualifications, an explanation may be ranked on a scale from potential to true. Not all explanations in science are of the D-N type, however.