enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Axiom of dependent choice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom_of_dependent_choice

    In mathematics, the axiom of dependent choice, denoted by , is a weak form of the axiom of choice that is still sufficient to develop much of real analysis. It was introduced by Paul Bernays in a 1942 article in reverse mathematics that explores which set-theoretic axioms are needed to develop analysis.

  3. 2-satisfiability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2-satisfiability

    Suppose that a 2-satisfiability instance contains two clauses that both use the same variable x, but that x is negated in one clause and not in the other. Then the two clauses may be combined to produce a third clause, having the two other literals in the two clauses; this third clause must also be satisfied whenever the first two clauses are ...

  4. Dependent clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependent_clause

    A dependent clause, also known as a subordinate clause, subclause or embedded clause, is a certain type of clause that juxtaposes an independent clause within a complex sentence. For instance, in the sentence "I know Bette is a dolphin", the clause "Bette is a dolphin" occurs as the complement of the verb "know" rather than as a freestanding ...

  5. Propositional formula - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propositional_formula

    The predicate calculus goes a step further than the propositional calculus to an "analysis of the inner structure of propositions" [4] It breaks a simple sentence down into two parts (i) its subject (the object (singular or plural) of discourse) and (ii) a predicate (a verb or possibly verb-clause that asserts a quality or attribute of the object(s)).

  6. Resolution (logic) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resolution_(logic)

    (The variable in the second clause was renamed to make it clear that variables in different clauses are distinct.) Now, unifying Q(X) in the first clause with ¬Q(Y) in the second clause means that X and Y become the same variable anyway. Substituting this into the remaining clauses and combining them gives the conclusion: ¬P(X) ∨ R(X)

  7. Boolean satisfiability problem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_satisfiability_problem

    For example, x 1 is a positive literal, ¬x 2 is a negative literal, and x 1 ∨ ¬x 2 is a clause. The formula (x 1 ∨ ¬x 2) ∧ (¬x 1 ∨ x 2x 3) ∧ ¬x 1 is in conjunctive normal form; its first and third clauses are Horn clauses, but its second

  8. T-unit - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-unit

    More technically, a T-unit is a dominant clause and its dependent clauses: as Hunt said: it is "one main clause with all subordinate clauses attached to it" (Hunt 1965:20). T-units are often used in the analysis of written and spoken discourse , such as in studies on errors in second language writing .

  9. Dependency graph - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependency_graph

    Dead code elimination: If no side effected operation depends on a variable, this variable is considered dead and can be removed. Dynamic graph analytics: GraphBolt [2] and KickStarter [3] capture value dependencies for incremental computing when graph structure changes. Spreadsheet calculators. They need to derive a correct calculation order ...