enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Capitol Records, Inc. v. MP3Tunes, LLC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitol_Records,_Inc._v...

    CSC Holdings, Inc. as guiding case law. The court rejected the applicability of that case because it did not involve an Internet service provider, and the court held that MP3tunes' utilization of "a standard data compression algorithm to eliminate redundant digital data" does not constitute the creation of a master copy.

  3. UMG Recordings, Inc. v. MP3.com, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UMG_Recordings,_Inc._v...

    UMG Recordings, Inc. v. MP3.com, Inc., 92 F. Supp. 2d 349 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) was a landmark case of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York concerning the unauthorized copying of copyrighted materials on the Internet.

  4. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    The United States Constitution contains several provisions regarding criminal procedure, including: Article Three, along with Amendments Five, Six, Eight, and Fourteen. Such cases have come to comprise a substantial portion of the Supreme Court 's docket.

  5. Daniel Penny manslaughter charge dismissed as jury breaks for ...

    www.aol.com/daniel-penny-jurors-tell-judge...

    Around 11 a.m., the jurors sent a note to the court stating, "We the jury request instructions from Judge [Maxwell] Wiley. At this time, we are unable to come to a unanimous vote on count 1 ...

  6. AOL's True Crime channel has the latest news on serial killers, current cases, controversial murder cases and more.

  7. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A&M_Records,_Inc._v...

    Napster's claims that it enabled legal sampling, space shifting, and permissive distribution (some artists had consented to the presence of their songs on the Napster service) were also rejected by the court. Furthermore, the court found that Napster could control the infringing behavior of the service's users, and therefore had a duty to do so ...

  8. The husband-wife legal team working on two of today’s biggest ...

    www.aol.com/husband-wife-legal-team-working...

    “Unpopular ideas aren’t criminal. Disgusting ideas aren’t criminal.” In recent months, Marc took on Combs’ case and has repeatedly asked the court to release the rapper on bond before trial.

  9. United States v. Hubbard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Hubbard

    Hubbard was a 1978 criminal court case charging Mary Sue Hubbard and several other members of the Church of Scientology with violations of various laws including: U.S.C. 18 §§ 2 (Aiding and Abetting), 371 (Conspiracy), 641 (Theft of Govt Property), 1503 (Obstruction of Justice), 1623 (False Declarations before a Grand Jury), and 2511(1)(a ...