enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan

    New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that ruled the freedom of speech protections in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution restrict the ability of a public official to sue for defamation.

  3. New york times v. sullivan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=New_york_times_v...

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_york_times_v._sullivan&oldid=106820238"

  4. Sarah Palin, NY Times have explored settlement, as ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/sarah-palin-ny-times-explored...

    Palin and media critics have viewed the case as a vehicle to overturn New York Times v. Sullivan, a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that made it much harder for public figures to prove ...

  5. Talk:New York Times Co. v. Sullivan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:New_York_Times_Co._v...

    The image involved here is a reproduction of a full-page New York Times ad, originally published on 29 March 1960. The ad was the subject matter of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan a very important case in US Constitutional law, and so an image of the actual ad might well be considered "iconic" and "historically significant" It is surely not ...

  6. US Supreme Court rejects tobacco firms' appeal over graphic ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-sidesteps...

    But the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in March found that the disputed warnings were "factual and uncontroversial," thus satisfying the relevant legal standard under the ...

  7. Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Publishing_Co._v._Butts

    However, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964), the Supreme Court decided that news organizations are still liable to public figures if the published information is created with actual malice. [ 2 ] The Court ultimately ruled in favor of Butts, and The Saturday Evening Post was ordered to pay $3.06 million to Butts in damages, which was later ...

  8. AOL

    search.aol.com

    The search engine that helps you find exactly what you're looking for. Find the most relevant information, video, images, and answers from all across the Web.

  9. From champagne to speeches, would-be Trump Supreme ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/champagne-speeches-trump-supreme...

    Donald Trump’s return to power is creating a reality television-like competition for attention among a group of black-robed candidates – some of whom may hope to one day wind up on the Supreme ...