Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In a key race to fill an open judicial seat at Oakland County Circuit Court, three lawyers vied in the non-partisan contest: Tricia Dare, Nicole Sophia-Calhoun Huddleston and Moneka Sanford. With ...
Sanford none none Tex. Civ. App. affirmed City of New Brunswick v. United States: 547 (1928) Sanford none none 3d Cir. reversed New Mexico v. Texas I: 557 (1928) Sanford none none original: rehearing denied New Mexico v. Texas: 558 (1928) Sanford none none original: boundary set Work v. Braffet: 560 (1928) Stone none none D.C. Cir. reversed
From October 8, 1840, to January 15, 1848, the court was known as the Supreme Court of the Kingdom of Hawaii.. This early Supreme Court was head by the King, the Kuhina Nui, and four other chiefs elected by the representative body to serve as Judges.
Note that, due to the several changes in the size of the Court since it was established in 1789, two seats have been abolished, both as a result of the Judicial Circuits Act of 1866 (and before the Court established the practice of hiring law clerks). Consequently, neither "seat 5" nor "seat 7" has a list article.
President Biden has the opportunity to improve his judicial legacy by signing the bipartisan JUDGES Act into law, which would ensure that all Americans have timely access to federal district courts.
On July 31, 2024, a hearing on his nomination was held before the Senate Judiciary Committee. [6] On September 19, 2024, his nomination was reported out of committee by a 13–8 vote. [ 7 ] [ 8 ] Hawley was one of four people recommended for the vacancy by Senators Dick Durbin and Tammy Duckworth .
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Stanley v. City of Sanford is a pending United States Supreme Court case in which the Court will determine whether or not a former employee who was qualified to perform her job and who earned post-employment benefits while employed lose her right to sue over discrimination with respect to those benefits solely because she no longer holds her job, under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.