Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Canadian trademark law provides protection to marks by statute under the Trademarks Act [1] and also at common law. Trademark law provides protection for distinctive marks, certification marks, distinguishing guises, and proposed marks against those who appropriate the goodwill of the mark or create confusion between different vendors' goods or services.
Refusals cannot be based on formality requirements. Refusal by one contracting party is limited to its own territory and does not affect the international registration in other designated jurisdictions. [13] WIPO must be notified of any refusal within six (or twelve) months of the date of publication in the International Designs Bulletin.
The Madrid Agreement and Madrid Protocol were adopted at diplomatic conferences held in Madrid, Spain. The Madrid Agreement was originally intended to provide for an international registration system, but did not achieve this for two significant reasons: The lack of international acceptance.
The Hague Agreement consists of several separate treaties, [2] the most important of which are: the Hague Agreement of 1925, the London Act of 2 June 1934, [3] the Hague Act of 28 November 1960 (amended by the Stockholm Act), [4] and the Geneva Act of 2 July 1999.
The concurrent use proceeding resumed, and in 1976, the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals awarded the Myrtle Beach hotel a federal trademark registration. [21] Even where a concurrent use registration is issued, the parties may eventually come to an agreement under which one party will surrender its registration.
A suggestive trademark tends to indicate the nature, quality, or a characteristic of the products or services in relation to which it is used, but does not describe this characteristic, and requires imagination on the part of the consumer to identify the characteristic. Suggestive marks invoke the consumer's perceptive imagination.
The doctrine of foreign equivalents is a rule applied in United States trademark law which requires courts and the TTAB to translate foreign words in determining whether they are registrable as trademarks, or confusingly similar with existing marks. The doctrine is intended to protect consumers within the United States from confusion or ...
The agreements establish a Special Union under Article 19 of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (1883). [4] Some aspects of the agreement have been superseded by the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights.