Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
County officials last week demanded that Viet America Society return $2.2 million in contract payments after the group suddenly fired auditors and failed to show the county how it spent the money.
The suit was filed on December 8, 2020, in conjunction with 46 states. The lawsuit was initially dismissed in June 2021, but was refiled with an amended complaint in August 2021. [2] The case survived Meta's motion to dismiss the lawsuit in January 2022 and April 2024. [3] The case is set to go to trial on April 14, 2025. [4]
The Internet Archive is a non-profit organization and legally a library; it is governed by copyright laws specific to libraries. It is based in San Francisco , California ; the Archive maintains Open Library , a digital library index and lending system.
Bonta, 141 S.Ct. 2373 (2021), is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the disclosure of donors to non-profit organizations. The case challenged California's requirement that non-profit organizations disclose the identity of their donors to the state's Attorney General as a precondition of soliciting donations in the state.
Many of these cases have lead to class action lawsuits and ... Free vehicle inspections are also being offered. ... Wells Fargo settled for a whopping $3.7 billion settlement — $1.7 billion ...
The CDL concept has not been tested in courts, and a lawsuit against the Open Library for copyright infringement was initiated by four publishers in June 2020. [67] This case, Hachette v. Internet Archive, was heard in the Southern District of New York. On March 25, 2023, the court ruled against the Internet Archive, which plans on appealing.
Two recent class-action lawsuits filed in California allege that this practice is discriminatory. The first suit, filed in December 2023, brought the complaint against Dunkin’ and seeks no less ...
The lawsuit named as defendants the Attorney General of British Columbia, the Attorney General of Canada, and two groups of intervenors who opposed the plaintiffs' claim. . These groups, named by Steeves as "Patient Intervenors" and "Coalition Intervenors," were, respectively, a four-person group of non-expert citizens who said they "experienced harm while being treated by physicians engaging ...