enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Regents of University of California v. Superior Court of Los ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regents_of_University_of...

    Regents of the University of California v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County , 4 Cal. 5th 607, 413 P.3d 656 (2018), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that universities owe a duty to protect students from foreseeable violence during curricular activities.

  3. Christian Legal Society v. Martinez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Legal_Society_v...

    Christian Legal Society v. Martinez, 561 U.S. 661 (2010), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld, against a First Amendment challenge, the policy of the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, governing official recognition of student groups, which required the groups to accept all students regardless of their status or beliefs in order to obtain ...

  4. Moore v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore_v._Regents_of_the...

    Moore v. Regents of the University of California was a landmark Supreme Court of California decision. Filed on July 9, 1990, it dealt with the issue of property rights to one's own cells taken in samples by doctors or researchers.

  5. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarasoff_v._Regents_of_the...

    Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (Cal. 1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient. The original 1974 decision mandated warning the threatened ...

  6. Tunkl v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunkl_v._Regents_of_the...

    This case history arose in relation to Cal. Civ. Code §1668, a statute that states "All contracts which have for their object, directly or indirectly, to exempt anyone from responsibility for his own fraud, or willful injury to the person or property of another, or violation of law, whether willful or negligent, are against the policy of the law."

  7. Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Homeland...

    Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, 591 U.S. 1 (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held by a 5–4 vote that a 2017 U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) order to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) immigration program was "arbitrary and capricious" under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and ...

  8. List of United States court cases involving the Fourteenth ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    states that provide a school to white students must provide in-state education to blacks Smith v. Allwright: 1944 321 U.S. 649 Race-based exclusion in political party primaries held unconstitutional Hedgepeth and Williams v. Board of Education: 1944 131 N.J.L. 153 NJ Supreme Court case that prohibited racial segregation in NJ schools Mendez v ...

  9. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 24 Cal.2d 453, 150 P.2d 436 (1944) Important case in the development of the common law of product liability in the United States based on the concurring opinion of California Supreme Court justice Roger Traynor who stated "that a manufacturer incurs an absolute liability when an article that he has placed on the market ...

  1. Related searches recent interesting court cases for students to study in california law university

    university of california regents caseregents of california v superior court
    university of california lawsuit