enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Standard of review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_of_review

    Questions of constitutionality are considered a type of question of law, and thus appellate courts always review lower court decisions that address constitutional issues de novo. However, the term "standard of review" has an additional meaning in the context of reviewing a law for its constitutionality, which concerns how much deference the ...

  3. Appellate procedure in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appellate_procedure_in_the...

    In some cases, an appellate court may review a lower court decision "de novo" (or completely), challenging even the lower court's findings of fact. This might be the proper standard of review, for example, if the lower court resolved the case by granting a pre-trial motion to dismiss or motion for summary judgment which is usually based only ...

  4. Appellate court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appellate_court

    Appellate courts nationwide can operate under varying rules. [3] Under its standard of review, an appellate court decides the extent of the deference it would give to the lower court's decision, based on whether the appeal were one of fact or of law. In reviewing an issue of fact, an appellate court ordinarily gives deference to the trial court ...

  5. Scope of review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scope_of_review

    Scope of review is to the appellate court what the burden of proof is to the trial court. [2] For example, in the United States, a party can preserve an issue for appeal by raising an objection at trial. Scope of review further relates to matters such as which judicial acts the appellate court can examine and what remedies it can apply ...

  6. Rational basis review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_basis_review

    In U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence, the nature of the interest at issue determines the level of scrutiny applied by appellate courts. When courts engage in rational basis review, only the most egregious enactments, those not rationally related to a legitimate government interest, are overturned. [3] [4] [5]

  7. Category:Appellate review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Appellate_review

    The appellate review category refers to both the scope and the standards of review given by an appellate court ... Standard of review; A.

  8. Supreme Court won't review admissions policy challenged as ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-wont-review-admissions...

    It was the second time this year the high court bypassed the chance to review what steps ... A unanimous three-judge panel of the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the city's ...

  9. Discretionary review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discretionary_review

    Discretionary review is the authority appellate courts have to decide which appeals they will consider from among the cases submitted to them. This offers the judiciary a filter on what types of cases are appealed, because judges have to consider in advance which cases will be accepted.