Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In other situations (especially regarding specific intent crimes that have "with intent to" in their definition), intent may be considered to refer to purpose only. Arguably, [ weasel words ] the most influential legal definitions of purpose and knowledge come from the Model Penal Code's definitions of mens rea .
The definition of intention provides that someone "intends" a result when: ...he wants it to exist or occur, is aware that it exists or is almost certain that it exists or will exist or occur. In 1993, the Law Commission revisited the definition of 'intention' proposing that: [A] person acts....'intentionally' with respect to a result when:
The severity of criminal offenses often depends on the type and the degree of intent involved. [91] [90] But the specific characterizations and the role of intent differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. [92] In criminal law, an important distinction is between general and specific intent. General intent is the weaker term.
A specific intent crime requires the doing of an act coupled with specific intent or objective. Specific intent cannot be inferred from the act. The major specific intent crimes are: conspiracy (intent to have crime completed), attempt (intent to complete a crime – whether specific or not, but falling short in completing the crime),
There also exist alternative forms of aggravated assault in English law, for example: assault or battery with intent to resist arrest (as above, the arrest must be lawful); and assault on, resistance to, and obstruction of constables. [55] Under the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, it is also possible to commit a racially aggravated assault. This ...
Absent a specific law, an inchoate offense requires that the defendant have the specific intent to commit the underlying crime. For example, for a defendant to be guilty of the inchoate crime of solicitation of murder , he or she must have intended for a person to die.
Transferred intent (or transferred mens rea, or transferred malice, in English law) is a legal doctrine that holds that, when the intention to harm one individual inadvertently causes a second person to be hurt instead, the perpetrator is still held responsible.
In common law, assault is the tort of acting intentionally, that is with either general or specific intent, causing the reasonable apprehension of an immediate harmful or offensive contact. Assault requires intent, it is considered an intentional tort, as opposed to a tort of negligence.