Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Metascience seeks to create a scientific foundation for peer review. Meta-research evaluates peer review systems including pre-publication peer review, post-publication peer review, and open peer review. It also seeks to develop better research funding criteria. Metascience seeks to promote better research through better incentive systems.
Scholarly peer review or academic peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of having a draft version of a researcher's methods and findings reviewed (usually anonymously) by experts (or "peers") in the same field. Peer review is widely used for helping the academic publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board or the ...
Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people with similar competencies as the producers of the work ( peers ). [1] It functions as a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. Peer review methods are used to maintain quality standards, improve performance, and provide credibility.
Articles published in respected peer-reviewed scientific journals are preferred for up-to-date reliable information. Scientific literature contains two major types of sources: primary publications that describe novel research for the first time, and review articles that summarize and integrate a topic of research into an overall view.
PLOS One. PLOS One (stylized PLOS ONE, and formerly PLoS ONE) is a peer-reviewed open access mega journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) since 2006. The journal covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine. The Public Library of Science began in 2000 with an online petition initiative by Nobel Prize ...
The replication crisis [a] is an ongoing methodological crisis in which the results of many scientific studies are difficult or impossible to reproduce. Because the reproducibility of empirical results is an essential part of the scientific method, [2] such failures undermine the credibility of theories building on them and potentially call ...
F1000 is an open research publisher for academic works. [6] Its model focuses on publishing findings quickly using a post-publication peer-review system. [7] Authors submit an article and all of its underlying data. [5] F1000 does a prepublication check and publishes the article, usually within a couple weeks.
bioRxiv, journals, and open peer review [ edit ] As a result of bioRxiv's popularity, many biology journals have updated their policies on preprints, [ 9 ] [ 13 ] clarifying they do not consider preprints to be a 'prior publication' for purpose of the Ingelfinger rule .