enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Insanity defense - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insanity_defense

    In Denmark a psychotic person who commits a criminal defense is declared guilty but is sentenced to mandatory treatment instead of prison. Section 16 of the penal code states that "Persons, who, at the time of the act, were irresponsible owing to mental illness or similar conditions or to a pronounced mental deficiency, are not punishable". [46]

  3. United States federal laws governing defendants with mental ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_laws...

    Per Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12.2, a defendant intending to pursue an insanity defense must timely notify an attorney for the government in writing. The government then has a right to have the court order a psychiatric or psychological examination.

  4. Durham rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durham_rule

    A Durham rule, product test, or product defect rule is a rule in a criminal case by which a jury may determine a defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity because a criminal act was the product of a mental disease. Examples in which such rules were articulated in common law include State v. Pike (1870) and Durham v

  5. Jury rejects insanity defense for man convicted of hate crime ...

    www.aol.com/jury-rejects-insanity-defense-man...

    Because the defense had the burden to prove Scolman was not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect — also known an NGI plea — the defense gave their opening statement before the prosecution.

  6. Man who killed two people declared not guilty by reason of ...

    www.aol.com/man-killed-two-people-declared...

    A man who killed two people near Wichita Falls will not stand trial for capital murder after all, according to court documents. Instead, Daniel Eric Roof, 44, will go to a mental institution.

  7. Kahler v. Kansas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahler_v._Kansas

    Kahler v. Kansas, 589 U.S. ___ (2020), is a case of the United States Supreme Court in which the justices ruled that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution do not require that states adopt the insanity defense in criminal cases that are based on the defendant's ability to recognize right from wrong.

  8. Not guilty by reason of insanity: Verdict for man, 79, who ...

    www.aol.com/not-guilty-reason-insanity-verdict...

    The defense presented testimony from toxicology and pharmaceutical experts, but only one who offered an opinion on whether Reynolds was not guilty by reason of insanity. Defense psychologist ...

  9. Jones v. United States (1983) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jones_v._United_States_(1983)

    Jones v. United States, 463 U.S. 354 (1983), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court, for the first time, addressed whether the due process requirement of the Fourteenth Amendment allows defendants, who were found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) of a misdemeanor crime, to be involuntarily confined to a mental institution until such times as they are no longer a danger ...