Ad
related to: usabilityhub tester software reviews
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Usability testing methods aim to evaluate the ease of use of a software product by its users. As existing methods are subjective and open to interpretation, scholars have been studying the efficacy of each method [1] [2] [3] and their adequacy to different subjects, comparing which one may be the most appropriate in fields like e-learning, [4] e-commerce, [5] or mobile applications.
Squish is a commercial cross-platform GUI and regression testing tool that can test applications based on a variety of graphical user interface (GUI) technologies (see list below). It is developed and maintained by Froglogic. [1] [2]
Hallway testing, also known as guerrilla usability, is a quick and cheap method of usability testing in which people — such as those passing by in the hallway—are asked to try using the product or service. This can help designers identify "brick walls", problems so serious that users simply cannot advance, in the early stages of a new design.
Cons: Testers must have specific software and hardware to complete testing. What to watch for: Most testing requires the use of a webcam, so testers should be comfortable on camera. 2. uTest
Linux Desktop Testing Project: Linux (With Windows and OSX ports) GUI applications with accessibility APIs (Collaborative project) GNU LGPL: Yes: 3.5.0 [7] Oracle Application Testing Suite: Windows: Web, Oracle Technology Products: Oracle: Proprietary: Yes: 12.5 [8] [9] Active QF-Test: Windows, Linux, macOS X, Web (cross-browser)
This page was last edited on 4 December 2019, at 09:27 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.
G2.com, formerly G2 Crowd, is a peer-to-peer review site headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. It was known as G2 Labs, Inc. until 2013. The company was launched in May 2012 by former BigMachines employees, with a focus on aggregating user reviews for business software.
Code review differs from related software quality assurance techniques like static code analysis, self-checks, testing, and pair programming. Static analysis relies primarily on automated tools, self-checks involve only the author, testing requires code execution, and pair programming is performed continuously during development rather than as ...
Ad
related to: usabilityhub tester software reviews