enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ku Klux Klan Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan_Act

    Section 1 (42 USC § 1983) [ edit ] Section 1 of the Act, which has since been amended and codified as section 1979 of the Revised Statutes ( 42 U.S.C. § 1983) and is also known simply as "Section 1983", authorized monetary and injunctive relief against anyone who, acting under the authority of state law, deprived a person of rights guaranteed ...

  3. Qualified immunity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_immunity

    Qualified immunity frequently arises in civil rights cases, [7] particularly in lawsuits arising under 42 USC § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents (1971). [8] Under 42 USC § 1983, a plaintiff can sue for damages when state officials violate their constitutional rights or other federal rights. The text of 42 USC § 1983 reads as ...

  4. Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monell_v._Department_of...

    Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978), is an opinion given by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court overruled Monroe v. Pape by holding that a local government is a "person" subject to suit under Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code: Civil action for deprivation of rights. [1]

  5. 42 U.S.C. §1983 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=42_U.S.C._§1983&redirect=no

    Pages for logged out editors learn more. Contributions; Talk; 42 U.S.C. §1983

  6. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bivens_v._Six_Unknown...

    The case was understood to create a cause of action against the federal government similar to the one in 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the states. However, the Supreme Court has sharply limited new Bivens claims. The Supreme Court has upheld Bivens claims only three times: in Bivens (1971), Davis v. Passman (1979), and Carlson v.

  7. Here's What to Know About Title 42 and What Could ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/heres-know-title-42-could...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  8. Williams v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Williams_v._Washington

    Whether exhaustion of state administrative remedies is required to bring claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in state court. Washington (Docket No. 23-191) is a pending United States Supreme Court case related to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

  9. Thompson v. Clark - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thompson_v._Clark

    iv, 42 u.s.c. § 1983 Clark , 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning whether a plaintiff suing for malicious prosecution must show that they were affirmatively exonerated of committing the alleged crime.