Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Merchants Mutual Liability Insurance Company v. Smart: 126 (1925) Taft none none N.Y. Sup. Ct. affirmed Carroll v. United States: 132 (1925) Taft none McReynolds W.D. Mich. affirmed Work v. United States ex rel. Rives: 175 (1925) Taft none none D.C. Cir. reversed Work v. United States ex rel. Chestatee Pyrites and Chemical Corporation: 185 ...
Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court that upheld the warrantless searches of an automobile, which is known as the automobile exception. The case has also been cited as widening the scope of search.
Carroll v. United States: 267 U.S. 132 (1925) whether police searches of automobiles without a warrant violate the Fourth Amendment: Samuels v. McCurdy: 267 U.S. 188 (1925) Whether the ban on continued possession of previously legal contraband (alcohol in this case) constitutes an ex post facto law George W. Bush & Sons Co. v. Maloy: 267 U.S ...
The motor vehicle exception was first established by the United States Supreme Court in 1925, in Carroll v. United States. [1] [2] The motor vehicle exception allows officers to search a vehicle without a search warrant if they have probable cause to believe that evidence or contraband is in the vehicle. [3]
March 2 – In an appeal originating in a Prohibition era bootlegging case, Carroll v. United States is decided in the Supreme Court, affirming the motor vehicle exception, that a warrantless search of an automobile does not contravene the Fourth Amendment, subject to probable cause and exigent circumstances. [2]
Pages in category "1925 in United States case law" ... volume 267; List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 268 ... volume 269; C. Carroll v. United States ...
The case is Carroll v Trump et al, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Nos. 20-3977, 20-3978. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; editing by Jonathan Oatis) Show comments.
In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ...