Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Frank v. Maryland, 359 U.S. 360 (1959), was a United States Supreme Court case interpreting the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.. Frank refused to allow the health inspectors into his home citing the Fourth Amendment.
The Fair Housing Amendment Act of 1988 did make a system of administrative law judges to hear housing discrimination cases to help against the illegal actions. Other examples of federal legislation may include increased federal legislation enforcement, scattered-site housing, [ 21 ] or state and local enforcement on a more concentrated level ...
The home inspector describes the condition of the home at the time of inspection but does not guarantee future condition, efficiency, or life expectancy of systems or components. Sometimes confused with a real estate appraiser, a home inspector determines the condition of a structure, whereas an appraiser determines the value of a property. In ...
Here are 6 unenforceable HOA rules in the US — and how you can protect your rights ASAP If it seems like just about every home on the market you see is part of a homeowners association (HOA ...
An estimated 10,000 Detroit residents, the majority of them Black, were displaced from their homes between 2010 and 2016 as The post Detroit homeowners continue calls for repayment of illegally ...
Following the 2021 Surfside collapse — which killed 98 people in Miami due to construction flaws — regulations now require more frequent inspections of condo buildings, while many condo ...
Building inspectors may charge a direct fee or a building permit fee. Inspectors may also be able to hold up construction work until the inspection has been completed and approved. [2] Some building inspection expertises like facade inspections are required by certain cities or counties and considered mandatory. These are to be done by ...
On November 2, 2010, Massachusetts voters rejected an initiative petition (Question 2) that would have repealed Chapter 40B. The vote was 1,254,759 (58%) against repeal to 900,405 (42%) in favor of repeal. [17] The Campaign to Protect the Affordable Housing Law, a state ballot committee, had been formed to oppose the elimination of the law. The ...