Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court considered the qualified immunity of a police officer to a civil ...
In Saucier v. Katz (2001), military officers Saucier and Parker were warned of possible protests during a speech from Vice President Albert Gore, Jr. When Katz began putting up a banner in defense of animal rights, Saucier detained Katz in his military van. Katz sued because he felt his Fourth Amendment rights had been violated.
Saucier v. Katz is overruled; courts need not determine whether a civil-rights plaintiff's constitutional rights were violated if they determine that the right was not clearly established at the time of the injury Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee: 555 U.S. 246 (2009)
Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court dealing with the doctrine of qualified immunity. [1]The case centered on the application of mandatory sequencing in determining qualified immunity as set by the 2001 decision, Saucier v.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
AOL Mail welcomes Verizon customers to our safe and delightful email experience!
Opinion counts only include the bench opinions listed above; opinions relating to orders or in-chambers opinions are not included. Agreement with the Court's judgment does not guarantee agreement with the reasoning expressed in its opinion.
Katz-Lacabe et al v. Oracle America, Inc.c/o Settlement Administrator1650 Arch Street, Suite 2210Philadelphia, PA 19103. You will be asked to provide a personal attestation along with your full ...