Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Yet, clearly the bond angles between all these molecules deviate from their ideal geometries in different ways. Bent's rule can help elucidate these apparent discrepancies. [5] [20] [21] Electronegative substituents will have more p character. [5] [20] Bond angle has a proportional relationship with s character and an inverse relationship with ...
In finance, bond convexity is a measure of the non-linear relationship of bond prices to changes in interest rates, and is defined as the second derivative of the price of the bond with respect to interest rates (duration is the first derivative). In general, the higher the duration, the more sensitive the bond price is to the change in ...
In practice the most significant of these is bond convexity, the second derivative of bond price with respect to interest rates. As the second derivative is the first non-linear term, and thus often the most significant, "convexity" is also used loosely to refer to non-linearities generally, including higher-order terms.
This angle may be calculated from the dot product of the two vectors, defined as a ⋅ b = ‖ a ‖ ‖ b ‖ cos θ where ‖ a ‖ denotes the length of vector a. As shown in the diagram, the dot product here is –1 and the length of each vector is √ 3, so that cos θ = – 1 / 3 and the tetrahedral bond angle θ = arccos ...
This difference in convexity can also be used to explain the price differential from an MBS to a Treasury bond. However, the OAS figure is usually preferred. The discussion of the "negative convexity" and "option cost" of a bond is essentially a discussion of a single MBS feature (rate-dependent cash flows) measured in different ways.
The bond angles in the table below are ideal angles from the simple VSEPR theory (pronounced "Vesper Theory") [citation needed], followed by the actual angle for the example given in the following column where this differs. For many cases, such as trigonal pyramidal and bent, the actual angle for the example differs from the ideal angle, and ...
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
In these compounds, it is not possible for the carbon atoms to assume the 109.5° bond angles with standard sp 3 hybridization. Increasing the p-character to sp 5 (i.e. 1 ⁄ 6 s-density and 5 ⁄ 6 p-density) [5] makes it possible to reduce the bond angles to 60°. At the same time, the carbon-to-hydrogen bonds gain more s-character, which ...