Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Whole-process people's democracy differs from liberal democracy in that it is a consequentialist model of political decision-making, aiming to be judged by how well the government is able to improve the socioeconomic lives of citizens, rather than solely being based on democratic processes.
China: Democracy That Works (Chinese: 中国的民主 [1]; lit. 'China's Democracy') is a white paper issued by China's State Council Information Office on 4 December 2021. [ 2 ] [ 3 ] The white paper lays out various aspects of the Chinese political system , which it claims constitute a whole-process people's democracy .
Xi has coined the term whole-process people's democracy (全过程人民民主), also called "whole-process democracy" (全过程民主, 全过程的民主) which he said "put the people as masters" and that in it "all major legislative decisions are made only after democratic deliberations and thorough procedures to ensure sound and democratic ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Whole-process people's democracy is a primarily consequentialist view, in which the most important criterion for evaluating the success of democracy is whether democracy can "solve the people's real problems," while a system in which "the people are awakened only for voting" is not truly democratic. [42] As a result, whole-process people's ...
This has encompassed a wide range of left wing ideologies which include Trotskyism, council communism, Leninism, social democracy, and democratic socialism. Whole-process people's democracy – political concept in China describing the people's participation in, and relationship to, governance under socialism with Chinese characteristics. [8]
This is not an overnight crisis but rather part of a yearslong process. Democracy has been on the slide since 2016, according to the Economist Intelligence Unit, a London research group whose ...
Democratic backsliding [a] is a process of regime change toward autocracy in which the exercise of political power becomes more arbitrary and repressive. [286] [287] [288] The process typically restricts the space for public contest and political participation in the process of government selection.