Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Durham v. United States, 214 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1954), [1] is a criminal case articulating what became known as the Durham rule for juries to find a defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity: "an accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or mental defect."
A Durham rule, product test, or product defect rule is a rule in a criminal case by which a jury may determine a defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity because a criminal act was the product of a mental disease. Examples in which such rules were articulated in common law include State v. Pike (1870) and Durham v. United States (1954).
1954 – Durham v. United States, 214 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1954), is a criminal case articulating what became known as the Durham rule for juries to find a defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity, that "an accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or mental defect". [4]
The two most consequential cases she participated in were Durham v. United States (1954) and Jenkins v. United States (1962). [7] Monte Durham was a client of Ives and she testified in his trial, [2] the result of which gave name to the Durham Rule, which found that a defendant could be found not guilty due to "mental disease or defect."
Bazelon was a nationally recognized advocate for the rights of the mentally ill, and his opinion in 1954's Durham v. United States (which adopted a new criminal insanity test) set off a long clash between the two judges, because Burger strongly opposed the new test. [19]
United States (1971) Durham v. United States (1954) This page was last edited on 7 February 2018, at 16:54 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons ...
This is also referred to as the cognitive capacity test. Meanwhile, the Durham Test (established in Durham v. United States, 1954) states that one can be declared insane if the actions were caused by a mental disorder. The vague nature of this description causes this definition to only be used in one state (New Hampshire).
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more