Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Durham v. United States, 214 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1954), [1] is a criminal case articulating what became known as the Durham rule for juries to find a defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity: "an accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or mental defect."
A Durham rule, product test, or product defect rule is a rule in a criminal case by which a jury may determine a defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity because a criminal act was the product of a mental disease. Examples in which such rules were articulated in common law include State v. Pike (1870) and Durham v. United States (1954).
Title Director Cast Genre Notes The Caine Mutiny: Edward Dmytryk: Humphrey Bogart, José Ferrer, Van Johnson: War, Drama: Columbia; based on Herman Wouk novel; 7 Oscar nominations
United States (1971) Durham v. United States (1954) This page was last edited on 7 February 2018, at 16:54 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons ...
The two most consequential cases she participated in were Durham v. United States (1954) and Jenkins v. United States (1962). [7] Monte Durham was a client of Ives and she testified in his trial, [2] the result of which gave name to the Durham Rule, which found that a defendant could be found not guilty due to "mental disease or defect."
Ron Shelton’s 1988 classic is playing as a musical theater show, reviving interest in the original film shot around the Triangle.
Bazelon was a nationally recognized advocate for the rights of the mentally ill, and his opinion in 1954's Durham v. United States (which adopted a new criminal insanity test) set off a long clash between the two judges, because Burger strongly opposed the new test. [19]
1954 – Durham v. United States, 214 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1954), is a criminal case articulating what became known as the Durham rule for juries to find a defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity, that "an accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or mental defect". [4]