Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought: all material published by Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable published source. The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is whether material can be attributed, not whether it is true. For more details, see Wikipedia:Attribution, which is proposed as policy.
Aim for one good article, not multiple permanent stubs: Individual chapters, divisions, departments, and other sub-units of notable organizations are only rarely notable enough to warrant a separate article. Information on chapters and affiliates should normally be merged into the article about the parent organization. See Wikipedia:Merging.
The articles of organization document typically includes the name of the LLC, the type of legal structure (e.g. limited liability company, professional limited liability company, series LLC), the registered agent, whether the LLC is managed by members or managers, the effective date, the duration (perpetual by default in most states), and the ...
Wikipedia articles about a person, company, or organization are not an extension of their website, press releases, or other social media marketing efforts. External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify notable organizations which are the topic of the article. Wikipedia neither endorses organizations nor runs ...
Articles here are not sales brochures. An article about a company or organization is not here to promote it; it is here to tell about it from a neutral point of view, using the information published about it in reliable sources. In many cases this will often include criticism of the company.
Wikipedia:Advocacy – discusses how Wikipedia is not a venue for raising the visibility of an issue or agenda. Wikipedia:Criticism – discusses how articles should include both positive and negative viewpoints from reliable sources, without giving undue weight to particular viewpoints, either negative or positive.
This may not be a serious issue. A Stub class article for an obscure subject may slightly annoy the rare reader who is searching for information on the subject, but otherwise does no harm. If most searches find articles that are C-class or above, Wikipedia is working well.
These do not refer to article content but to issues related to the proper display of article content. Current event and temporal templates such as {{ current }} or {{ recent death }} . These alert the reader that the article content may be subject to a flux of recent and upcoming significant changes for reasons beyond the control of Wikipedia.